Skip to content Skip to Search
Skip navigation

What went wrong with nature-based carbon credits

The United Nations’ REDD+ scheme gives developing countries money for preventing deforestation Unsplash/Projeto Café Gato Mourisco
The United Nations’ REDD+ scheme gives developing countries money for preventing deforestation
  • 90% of projects ‘unsuitable for offset claims’
  • Price of nature-based credits down 95%
  • Expert calls for honesty over failures

Nature-based carbon credits were supposed to be a means whereby countries and companies, Middle Eastern entities among them, could offset their greenhouse gas emissions.

Advocates of the credits have argued they help mitigate climate change and at the same time benefit rural communities. 

Yet the reality has disappointed. After Cop26 in Glasgow in late 2021, carbon credit prices soared. But their value has since collapsed because of a lack of confidence in their validity.

Nature-based carbon credits were trading at $1.03 on November 2, down 94.5 percent from a peak in January 2022 of $18.70, according to

Forestry – preventing deforestation and growing new trees – is at the centre of the proposition, and the disappointment.

Under the United Nations’ REDD+ framework, developing countries can receive money for preventing deforestation.

The UN says REDD+ incentivises countries to “take social, policy and environmental measures to help conserve forests” through several activities: reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; conservation and enhancement of forest carbon stocks; and sustainable management of forests.

Instead, reality has bitten. 

Finland’s Compensate Foundation analysed around 170 nature-based carbon offset projects certified by verification agencies and found that 90 percent were unsuitable for offset claims.

Jonathan Crook, a global carbon markets policy expert at Belgium’s Carbon Market Watch, said that because of weak structures, nature-based credits could have the opposite of their desired effect.

“If the carbon credits are low-quality and are used to offset real emissions instead of the purchasing companies cutting their own emissions, then the creation and trade of these credits could actually increase emissions,” Crook warned.

A major flaw in carbon credits that claim to prevent deforestation is so-called “leakage”. Local people and commercial loggers simply take their wood from locations other than the protected area.

Similarly, a forest may have been preserved anyway without the associated carbon credits, and the carbon credit scheme therefore lacks “additionality”.

Niklas Kaskeala, chairman of the Compensate Foundation, said: “Potential buyers must focus on the quality of the projects underlying the credits. If they’re not additional, then you’re paying for something that’s just business as usual.”

Over-crediting is another common problem.

This has led some corporate buyers of nature-based credits to present their purchases as contributing to environmental protection, not as emissions offsets.

Kaskeala said: “It would be a false claim to say that you counterbalanced or offset your emissions via most nature-based credits. They’re of insufficient quality to enable counterbalancing or offset claims.”

The control area against which potential deforestation in the area underpinning the credits is compared is rarely measured – another flaw.

Creators of deforestation avoidance-based carbon credits have a strong incentive to choose a comparison area that is unlike the project (or protected) area. For example, the project area could be in a remote location without roads or human presence with plenty of trees, whereas the reference area is often near a town where deforestation is much likelier, Kaskeala said. The result? The nature-based carbon credit project shows lots of additionality. 

“Nature-based carbon credits are built on trust, because you’re trading something intangible,” Kaskeala said. “If you erode that trust, you don’t have a market. That’s why it’s crucial we expose these flaws and start rebuilding the trust by being honest about what went wrong.”

The situation is not entirely hopeless. The Integrity Council for Voluntary Carbon Markets aims to set global benchmarks for carbon credits and offsets. The first projects created under its auspices are due to be approved and launched in 2024. Australia’s Carbon Market Institute is doing something similar.

Kaskeala said: “There’s a vast number of initiatives and these are an improvement, but where most of them fall short is in failing to acknowledge it’s almost impossible to make that equivalency between the emissions you cause and then the offsets you pay for.”

Latest articles

FILE PHOTO: United Arab Emirates Minister of State for Foreign Trade Thani Al Zeyoudi gestures during an interview with Reuters in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, June 30, 2022. REUTERS/Abdel Hadi Ramahi/File Photo

UAE and Kenya complete Cepa negotiations

The UAE and Kenya have completed negotiations on a comprehensive economic partnership agreement (Cepa) between the two countries. It is the 12th Cepa deal secured by the UAE and its third in Africa, after agreements were signed last year with Mauritius and the Republic of the Congo (Congo-Brazzaville). “The UAE-Kenya Cepa will not only boost […]

Adnoc has bid for German polymer manufacturer Covestro but its offers €55 and €57 per share were rejected

Adnoc faces hurdles in completing ambitious European deals

Abu Dhabi state oil company Adnoc is facing challenges to a duo of major European deals it is trying to get over the finish line, according to media reports. Talks with Austrian energy group OMV have been put on hold to allow parties to navigate a series of disagreements, the Financial Times reported on Friday. […]

The 450 companies operating at Dubai Science Park include AstraZeneca, and the free zone plans to add 200,000 sq ft of lab and office space

Dubai Science Park reveals expansion plans

Dubai’s biotechnology free zone is adding 60 percent more offices, laboratories and warehouses over the next few years to cater for an influx of new companies, its senior vice-president told AGBI.  Dubai Science Park, part of Dubai-listed Tecom Group, is planning an expansion of 200,000 sq ft of additional storage and logistics facilities at the […]

A worker at a phosphate production plant in Metlaoui, Tunisia. Phosphate accounts for 15% of Tunisia's exports

Saudi Arabia loans $55m for Tunisian rail renewal

Saudi Arabia has signed a $55 million loan deal with Tunisia to finance the renewal of the North African country’s rail network.  The railway is used to transport phosphate, a sector that makes up around 4 percent of Tunisia’s GDP and 15 percent of the country’s exports. Tunisia plans to produce eight million tonnes by […]